Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delgado Street Bridge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) Interstellarity (talk) 12:56, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delgado Street Bridge[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Either delete it or make it more detailed, editors! JTZegers (talk) 19:39, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – as a listed property on the NRHP, it is inherently notable; see here for further explanation. CJK09 (talk) 19:44, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Isn’t this listed in the National Register of Historic Places and therefore satisfies WP:NBUILDING? — MarkH₂₁^talk 19:45, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - NRHP contributing property. https://catalog.archives.gov/id/77846810 184.153.150.57 (talk) 19:54, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep for NRHP property. Nominator is an eager new editor who is on an AfD spree but doesn't understand ins-and-outs of notability yet. Schazjmd (talk) 20:35, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:44, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep - NRHP properties are inherently notable. Hog Farm (talk) 23:46, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I expanded the article from information that was in the linked historical cultural properties inventory form. Had this information been included in the article in the first place... oh, never mind. It's useless for me to voice my opinion on this issue again. Whatever. I'll let other people decide whether this article is worth keeping or deleting, as well as whether it's worth it for me to expand short articles on short bridges. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 02:09, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 08:59, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 08:59, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.