Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delegate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn. I can clean this up without a mop-wielder. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:36, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delegate[edit]

Delegate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

per WP:TNT - the disambiguation page at Delegate (disambiguation) can be moved to this title. The material on delegates to US political party national conventions is unsourced and WP:UNDUE here. There's a bad set of dict-defs and disambiguation content mixed in. I don't see a need to rename this to United States national political convention delegate. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:56, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:40, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:40, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 17:32, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep WP:TNT is neither policy nor guideline. The actual policies are WP:ATD and WP:PRESERVE which make it clear that we work with such pages to improve them, rather than deleting them and their history – over 14 years of history in this case. Also relevant is WP:BROADCONCEPT which states "if the primary meaning of a term proposed for disambiguation is a broad concept or type of thing that is capable of being described in an article, and a substantial portion of the links asserted to be ambiguous are instances or examples of that concept or type, then the page located at that title should be an article describing it, and not a disambiguation page." If the nominator thinks they can do better than the current or previous drafts then they should prepare a version to demonstrate this. Here's a book on the subject to assist them: Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Andrew D. (talk) 22:55, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.