Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dejobaan Games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:31, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dejobaan Games

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Developer of notable video games fails WP:GNG; their game is notable, but notability is not inherited. On the WP:VG/RS custom Google search engine, very little results discuss the studio; not enough to merit its own article. Redirect to AaaaaAAaaaAAAaaAAAAaAAAAA!!! – A Reckless Disregard for Gravity. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 09:10, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:03, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:03, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:08, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Subject of independent reliable coverage.[1][2][3] Video games developer notability would be better aligned with WP:MUSIC where a degree of notability is inherited - redirecting the creator of multiple independently notable works to a single notable work is not helpful, you're making a bad assumption on behalf of the reader. Just a bare bones list of games, a glorified disambiguation page would be more useful for a reader searching for the subject. - hahnch e n 08:38, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Hahnchen:, sorry for my late reply. I did notice those results too, but do you think that those mean Dejobaan Games meets WP:GNG? soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 07:48, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - splitting into multiple articles for notable games is inefficient and this is a game developer with 17 titles. Agree with the findings of Hahnchen above.Tarinth (talk) 01:02, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 00:37, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.