Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defunct Games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. howch e ng {chat} 17:21, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Defunct Games

What is this?? This looks to me like someone who is trying to promote a list of games that once existed but ceased to exist. Please delete if no one can turn it into a real article. Georgia guy 00:59, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Care to explain what that complaint means? "promote a list of games that once existed but ceased to exist" What? killerclaw
It's a vanity website article. Delete. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 01:03, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:WEB --keepsleeping quit your job! slack off! 01:04, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's info about a website... I fail to see what the big deal is. Defunct Games isn't a small time website, it get's over a million hits a month and gets press passes for E3. I Feel the aarticle needs improvement, yes, but there is certainly no reason to throw out the idea of a page for the site. (unsigned comment by Killerclaw (talk · contribs)
Delete. My site gets passes to E3 and 2 million hits a month and we don't meet WP:WEB either. RasputinAXP _talk _contribs 01:24, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Likewise for my site. Advertise elsewhere, please. Delete. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:55, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article is useless at confirming any kind of notability, or really providing any information at all. At that, the Wikipedia isn't supposed to have an article on every individual sidewalk tile leading from my house to the nearest 7-11. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 01:26, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable website. Sycthos ^Talk 02:43, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per nomination. — Moe ε 03:16, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Ter e nc e Ong 13:40, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Rather a nice site, but not notable enough. Delete. --Wrathchild ^(talk) 15:09, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nomination. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 19:29, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. B.ellis 21:03, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Even if the world was in mortal danger and could only be saved by someone expert in some long-defunct game which was too crap to survive against the competition offered by Solitaire, I still wouldn't care enough to visit this website. Even if it has (just) managed to scrape inside the million mark on Alexa. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 22:21, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As above, and really, doesn't this stuff get covered to some degree in Abandonware? — T-Boy: (complain bitterly) (laugh contemptuously) 01:26, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.