Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defence Christian Network
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete per author request. ✗plicit 14:26, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Defence Christian Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Total lack of notability, no significant attention in reliable, independent sources. The sources given are either not independent or significant (their own website, the UK government, the "charitycommission" or "christiansingovernment"), or unknown (what is "Contact"? Their own magazine, someone else's? Unverifiable as written). Looking for better sources gives nothing in Gbooks (logical for a recent organisation) or GNews (much more worrying, a notable organisation in the UK should have some GNews results surely), and very few other hits (only 45!). Article also gives no idea about why the network would be a notable organisation. Fram (talk) 12:01, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 12:01, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 12:01, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 12:01, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 12:01, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't agree the assessment (how can the UK Government or Charity Commission be described as non-notable?!), but I want the article deleted anyway please. Bermicourt (talk) 12:38, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Neither of these sources was described as non-notable? They aren't independent, they don't confer notability, but that doesn't mean (obviously) that e.g. the UK government itself wouldn't be notable. Anyway, you can tag the article with Template:Db-g7 if you want it deleted. Fram (talk) 12:43, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Done that - thanks for the tip. Bermicourt (talk) 14:18, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Neither of these sources was described as non-notable? They aren't independent, they don't confer notability, but that doesn't mean (obviously) that e.g. the UK government itself wouldn't be notable. Anyway, you can tag the article with Template:Db-g7 if you want it deleted. Fram (talk) 12:43, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.