Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defeating Eurabia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Fjordman.  Sandstein  13:38, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Defeating Eurabia

Defeating Eurabia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self-published book, not reviewed by notable publications Jason from nyc (talk) 16:36, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

• Delete as unnotable. The one reference is about the blogger, who has a wiki article, not the book. SalHamton (talk) 17:51, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:29, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

• Redirect to Fjordman. I'm mixed over this and if someone could find just one more source, I'd be willing to be persuaded to keep a separate article for the book. It's just that we only have the three sources and for the most part they talk more about Fjordman himself than the book. Most of this information is either already available in the main article or could be somewhat easily added. At this point in time I think that this information would be best served by merging into the main article and having this serve as a redirect to Fjordman. As far as reviews go, you don't always have to have reviews to keep an article about a book- you can have news articles. There just aren't enough and like I said, this could just as easily be merged and redirected.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:26, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
• Merge with Fjordman. Not notable per WP:BKCRIT. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 16:18, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.