Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deerbrook Editions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:25, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deerbrook Editions

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I find no coverage beyond parentheticals and asides indicating that it is the publisher of whatever book is being discussed in a given source. Fails WP:N. Largoplazo (talk) 21:07, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 21:29, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maine-related deletion discussions. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 21:29, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:45, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:45, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:45, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 23:06, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 23:12, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:23, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: at this time, there is nothing which conveys notability for a stand alone article; fails WP:CORP. Kierzek (talk) 21:50, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I feel like a Grinch, deleting a reputable, small, literary publisher. But we do need sources, and I can't find them. There should be no prejudice against a fresh article on this publisher by an editor who can soruce one. E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:49, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.