Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deer Fang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. theProject 23:03, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deer Fang[edit]

1. WP:NOT soapbox 2. Self-promotion 3. Advertising of their website Overlap.org, 4. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information: Internet guides, 5. WP:COI Editing from too close "little-known musician or band should preferably not be by the musician, no verifiable notoriety given 6. NPOV, 7. style, 8. unreferenced Widefox 04:54, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-notable biography, does not meet any of the requirements on WP:BIO of wider mention, and the article is lifted bodily from here. You could probably have just prod'ed this. --tjstrf 05:07, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, - admin - please group with Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Overlap.org and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jon_Phillips (He's been deleted before but right this second, just couldn't workout how to create new AfD page). There are other members and a new one is being added today Solsken . Best to clear that new one out if it arrives in next few days. Widefox 05:25, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - I don't really see an assertion of notability. "Affiliated projects" doesn't count: we're all affiliated with Wikipedia as editors but this doesn't allow us to have an article about ourselves in the main namespace. So tagged. MER-C 05:55, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Funky name though. Ultra-Loser ^{Talk | BT sites} 08:35, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (recycled message) Per every one of the 8 points the nominator has put forward, I agree completely. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 11:07, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable --Amxitsa 22:19, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.