Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepti Pillay Sivan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 19:47, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deepti Pillay Sivan[edit]

Deepti Pillay Sivan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ARTIST. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. Kolma8 (talk) 17:32, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Kolma8 (talk) 17:32, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Kolma8 (talk) 17:32, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kolma8 (talk) 17:32, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. The 4-5 sources found via google search do not satisfy even WP:BASIC. Also, notability is not inherited. VV 08:54, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 23:05, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please take a look at the new sources added by User:Jehowahyereh.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:22, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Delete - difficult discussion, especially given the sources added since the AfD was filed, but still a borderline delete. The subject accrued a decent level of media coverage in 2018 and had their film nominated (with one win) for international awards - however, this coverage is mostly centered on the documentary itself and is likely not enough to fulfil WP:DIRECTOR. Post 2018 coverage of the subject is also lacking, implying that other parts of WP:DIRECTOR (i.e being widely cited by peers and producing a significant body of work) have not been met. Maybe in the future the subject will continue to accrue more coverage, but it is WP:TOOSOON for now. SamHolt6 (talk) 13:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - There is Post 2018 coverage about the subject, The documentary film got selected to Toronto International Film Festival and won the Best Biographical Film award in Toronto International Women Film Festival in 2021 and I have added significant news reference which talks about it and the subject in detail which were published in 2021.I feel that the article deserved to be Kept. Jehowahyereh (talk) 17:09, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - 3rd and 4th point of WP:DIRECTOR met and thus passes WP:DIRECTOR Jehowahyereh (talk) 17:27, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.