Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepthi Kapse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 04:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deepthi Kapse

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR has just made her debut upcoming a case of WP:TOOSOON Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:40, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 06:44, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete A7 - This article makes no credible claim of notability. Inclusion in a barely notable film is not a claim of significance, IMO. --Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 06:46, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and I would've also tagged as A7 but because of the film, it would simply be a matter of who wants to delete as such. Delete anyway though as this clearly is not better satisfying WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister talk 07:55, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is about the best coverage out there, but it is insufficient to meet WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. /wiae /tlk 16:49, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The page has not been properly tagged with the AfD notice.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It was removed by an IP editor here ,I have restored it.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:10, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.