Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepin

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2016 August 17.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nobody actually advocates anything other than deletion. Sandstein 07:23, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deepin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of any reliable sources covering the subject. Basically all the sources I could find were blogs, I previously tagged it for CSD G4, but it was declined. See also, previous AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linux Deepin. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 01:39, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 01:39, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This article seems legitimate and clears up some naming issues. Mackensen (talk) 01:59, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This linux.com article should meet WP:GNG requirements. --Wcam (talk) 02:46, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Hi, I am a member of Deepin Technology Team and we have already noticed the problem, this is the first time I myself look into it. Now we see how it went wrong, we are working on the "unreliable sources" now , and we are hoping to fix the issue within this week (today to 22nd of July), we just need some time to do it. AlickDeepin (talk) 03:00, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Hi there, we have collected several sources yet we are having trouble creating links with WebCite, we have initiated a plan to encourage international deepin users to help us editting this article. We believe that will be a better solution. As the Italian version of deepin's wiki page is so much better than the one we did.AlickDeepin (talk) 06:19, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yellow Dingo (talk) 06:49, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I had a look at it before as well. My primary concern is that for software, it is quite easy to "create" news (particularly reviews). This needs to be evaluated alongside other softwares. What I see here is that a distro which is not really very popular - although it may be sometime in the future, maybe a couple of years? Per Wikipedia:NSOFTWARE I consider this as a WP:PRODUCT and there is no evidence that this is "significant in its particular field". Delete for now. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- not independently notable. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:07, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.