Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepika Pilli
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 17:10, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deepika Pilli[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Deepika Pilli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable actress. Fails WP:NACTRESS. Declined twice at AfC but the author bypassed review and moved the draft to mainspace. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment what's a team lead in a tv show supposed to be? Oaktree b (talk) 23:06, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- It's an arrangement on this particular dance show where someone popular leads a team of dancers (even though they are not dancers themselves). -- Ab207 (talk) 07:12, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet WP:ENT; Pilli is not a dancer to claim notability via a dance show. Also lacks significant coverage in reliable sources to meet GNG. -- Ab207 (talk) 07:15, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as per WP:ENT norms, not fulfill the notability criterion. Pinakpani (talk) 08:05, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Does not pass either WP:GNG nor WP:ENT. this article lacks significant coverage and notability.Juggyevil (talk) 14:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: fails WP:NACTRESS; and WP:GNG-no significant coverage in sources — DaxServer (talk) 08:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.