Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Singhal (banker)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I note that the only two editors arguing to keep both have extremely limited editing history and (more importantly) failed to give any policy-based reasons for keeping. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:26, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deepak Singhal (banker)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This all seems to be pretty standard WP:MILL coverage and as notability isn't inherited, I don't see how this person is independently notable. I previously redirected Deepak Singhal (Reserve Bank of India) (now at Deepak Singhal, RBI) for this reason and as a result, this was created, so I'm suggesting deletion and a redirect as it seems a likely search term. Praxidicae (talk) 14:14, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'd draftified it; MJL then accepted it so might have a view. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:22, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:31, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:31, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Curb Safe Charmer: [Thank you for the ping] Per WP:POLOUTCOMES, my impression is that regional director for the Reserve Bank of India would be considered a subnational cabinet position of sorts. As this was possibly an undisclosed WP:COI article, though; I won't shed a tear if it is deleted. I guess my personal preference is straight redirect over delete then redirect per the concerns nom has brought up. –MJL ‐Talk‐^🍰 15:16, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The coverage seems to be the usual mandatory reporting for legal reasons and name drop without sufficient biographical depth to establish WP:ANYBIO and WP:BIO. Seems to be non-notable. scope_creep^Talk 20:38, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The additional references and citations as desired by other reviewers have been added. Further citations will be added in due course. This article should be kept open for other reviewers to provide their valuable inputs.Central Bankster (talk) 16:07, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Central Bankster is the creator of the contested article. -The Gnome (talk) 07:55, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete. Article is well written. I made some corrections.Sahasrara (talk) 17:01, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Delete per nomination on account of subject's lack of notability per WP:ANYBIO criteria. All that one can find on the web, and indeed this is all that has been added since the AfD process started, were routine announcements of appointment and news about the banks rather than the person, who's at best name dropped (e.g. here; here; here; here; etc). -The Gnome (talk) 07:55, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The coverage is not in depth enough and WP:ANYBIO is not established Taewangkorea (talk) 09:20, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.