Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep Fantasy (Surfing album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:06, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deep Fantasy (Surfing album)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only 1 or two usable sources, the rest are either streaming services (YouTube, Spotify) or generally unreliable (who sampled, Discogs). Pretty much just fails WP:NMUSIC. Micro (Talk) 01:35, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Micro (Talk) 01:35, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:41, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:41, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (or Speedy Delete) per WP:A9 because there is no article for the band. The text of A9 says it could be overcome if there is a claim that the album is important, but this article only claims that it is "one of the examples" of its genre, which is not too impressive. A search only finds routine retail/streaming entries and attempted self-promotions in social media, many of which have already been used to pad the article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 01:16, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.