Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dedicated to the Ones We Love

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn in light of article improvement.. LibStar (talk) 12:47, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dedicated to the Ones We Love[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NALBUMS. no evidence of significant third party coverage or charting on major charts. [1] LibStar (talk) 07:44, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have to be joking there is a wealth of third party references out there. Dan arndt (talk) 08:42, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

whilst i acknowledge you added sources. this one says nothing. this one and this one are purely directory listings which confirms its existence. and this one is a primary source. lacks indepth coverage, where are the major reviews of this? LibStar (talk) 08:46, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retain the article clearly complies with WP:NALBUMS, in that if the musician or ensemble is notable, and if the album in question has been mentioned in multiple reliable sources, then their officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia. The Blackeyed Susans are clearly a notable Australian band and the album is mentioned in multiple reliable sources. Dan arndt (talk) 09:44, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

yes passing mentions in other sources rather than indepth coverage. LibStar (talk) 09:49, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

this added source is merely a one line mention. LibStar (talk) 09:58, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unbelieveable that whole article is an indepth interview with the two principals of The Blackeyed Susans discussing the album. Didn't you read it? Dan arndt (talk) 13:38, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Notable band, album described in multiple reliable sources. LibStar's claim that the source added is "merely a one line mention" is misleading: the title may be mentioned only once but thereafter it is referred to as the album / covers album or by individual tracks. I've added some more material on the album's Background and another reference (it only mentions the album title once).shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 22:17, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

keep as per @Shaidar cuebiyar & @Dan arndt there are multiple RS listed as references. Kathodonnell (talk) 06:57, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.