Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Declaration (book)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Kurykh (talk) 01:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declaration (book)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBOOK, tagged since 2012. — JFG ^talk 15:41, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 16:20, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There are discussions of this publication by Negri and Hardt in some recent books: [1], [2]. AllyD (talk) 16:20, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There is a small body of literature about this pamphlet. Try searching Declaration + Hardt + Negri. E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:28, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Further to above comments, I have found this discussing it and this, this, this, and this citing it. There is also this inverview with Hardt: the intro mentions the book as his latest. Perhaps not all entirely reliable but maybe just enough to save the article — Iadmc ♫^talk 10:52, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:52, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are a significant number articles with non-trivial coverage mentioned above. Not all in-depth but beyond simple mentions of the title and subject. Enough to satisfy WP:NBOOK. Gab4gab (talk) 13:55, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.