Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deck of 52

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Scientizzle 14:32, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deck of 52

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not assert notability of any sort, and pretty grossly violates WP:GAMEGUIDE. Really all that one can say about the article in a positive manner. Kung Fu Man (talk) 14:29, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) Kung Fu Man (talk) 14:32, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The only external links lead to websites which also are game guides. Not notable and WP:NOTGUIDE. -- doorautomatica (talk) 06:30, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Normally I don't use this, but "per everyone else". Everything that needs to be said has been. Its WP:GAMETRIVIA and fails WP:NOTGUIDE. If the subject had any significant coverage (which it doesn't) I'd be more lenient, but even then it would need a 100% total rewrite. --Teancum (talk) 11:40, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and move to whichever gaming wiki needs this. No notablity ascertained. Clearly fancruft/guide. No developmetn or reception sections. — Hellknowz ▎talk 15:23, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:GAMECRUFT: take it to Wikia Gaming. Marasmusine (talk) 19:34, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.