Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debra Davenport

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 20:20, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Debra Davenport

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks notability and significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains^(talk) 00:56, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:02, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:03, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:03, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable individual.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:34, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. Even if notable, this puff piece would be a definite case of WP:TNT. Edwardx (talk) 15:01, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Promotional bio. Subject is no relation, for what its worth. Carrite (talk) 16:59, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.