Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deathstep

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 00:42, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deathstep[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable topic. No references. Orphan. Ambiguous advertisement? Technical 13 (talk) 23:17, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as completely unreferenced and with no claim to notability. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:27, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails to establish notability and zero sources. --76.189.111.2 (talk) 04:59, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI... the creator of the article (User:A11HAV3FA113N) removed the AfD notice from the article and added a YouTube video to the external links with this edit. The edit was reverted immediately by a bot. --76.189.111.2 (talk) 05:43, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete - spectacularly non-notable, per WP:GNG. ukexpat (talk) 16:35, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. — Satori Son 13:39, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Perhaps a speedy delete is now in order per WP:SNOW. --76.189.111.2 (talk) 18:06, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.