Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deanna Johnston

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deanna Johnston[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable reality tv personality/actor. No evidence (in the article or through extensive google searches) of significant coverage in reliable third party sources. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 00:54, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:30, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:31, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:31, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - does not meet notability guidelines under WP:BIO. Does not have significant coverage in third-party sources; the top google hits are for another person with the same name.PohranicniStraze (talk) 02:42, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not true. This Deanna Johnston with a T is still the top Google response. Did you mistype?JefferShip (talk) 03:59, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry JefferShip but yet again you are showing a complete lack of understanding of Wikipedia's WP:NOTE and WP:BIO guidelines. I strongly recommend you read those and WP:RS --- PageantUpdater (talk) 05:57, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 23:57, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG. The article has only one source, and the argument that something is a top hit on Google adds nothing to its notability. DrStrauss talk 21:31, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.