Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deafhead
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 01:31, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Deafhead[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Deafhead (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. A Google search reveals one relevant article, and the other results are mostly regurgitation of this WSJ article. Relevant info should be folded into Deadhead. — GhostRiver 20:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Disability, and Popular culture. — GhostRiver 20:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:49, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.