Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dead File (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Haven't closed an AFD as NC for well over a year!, Anyway been up 4 weeks and I honestly see no point relisting for the 4th time as lets be honest we're not gonna get another !vote now so will simply close as NC, (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 02:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dead File

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot see the notability of this. Plus, even if it is kept, it needs to be re-written as the language is rather informal and the style is certainly non-encyclopedic. The Traditionalist (talk) 19:56, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:55, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for the same reasons as before. That it needs to be rewritten is not a "plus" it's a totally different issue. --Samuel J. Howard (talk) 20:22, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - sources are all primary, no coverage in secondary sources, this is about internal proceedings of an organization, which is not of any interest to the broad public. Kraxler (talk) 17:08, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:02, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:40, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.