Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeRuosi Nut
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:04, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- DeRuosi Nut (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:NCORP Source are minor mentions or not independent. Lack of in-depth coverage in RS. MB 20:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MB 20:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MB 20:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:23, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Coverage is insufficient — passing mention in a local paper (here) and an article in an industry outlet here. Note as well that the page has been WP:REVDEL'd because of copying from the former source. WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs) 00:43, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- KEEP. Coverage is sufficient — passing mention in a local paper (here) and an article in an industry outlet here. Note that there are proper sources in this page so if we can make correction to those who are not proper and keep the proper. Help me make this page because it does not have to be deleted if some sources are okay. KingCreation (KC)(talk, contribs) 08:19, 9 February 2022 (UTC)KingCreation (talk) 23:36, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. although it has some minor press, it is not enough coverage to meet notability. The WP:GNG says you need significant coverage, so 6 citations is hardly significant. Caphadouk (talk) 22:45, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nom. Seems like WP:MILL. — BriefEdits (talk) 18:20, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
KEEP. DeRuosi Nut is a San Joaquin county, privately held company like many others in the county it should have a place on wikipedia. DeRuosi Nut is mentioned on the pages: San Joaquin County, California & Escalon, California as it already holds multiple placements on the platform using the same imagery and a similar purpose. DeRuosi Nut seems WP:N. This page has notable sources that are significant. In comparison to neighboring companies (geographically) an in a similar industry such as The Wine Group. The Wine Group only has 2 sources given and only one of the sources is an active link to a real article. The DeRuosi Nut page shows to be more notable than surrounding companies with multiple live, in-depth articles regarding the company DeRuosi Nut. KingCreation (talk) 02:11, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.