Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dayanand S. Nadkarni
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 01:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Dayanand S. Nadkarni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Looks like politicians are wiki notable - he is credited. DoNotTellDoNotAsk (talk) 22:44, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep if a reference of his political office, as claimed, can be found.. WP:POLITICIAN, which simply requires having held office at sub-national (provincial) level, which is the case here. Notwithstanding, the article could clearly do with some work! Wikipeterproject (talk) 22:47, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Have added a sourced for him elected to the Karnataka State Legislative Assembly [1] (listed as N.D. Sarveshwar). Satisfies #1 for WP:POLITICIAN as a member of provincial legislature.--Sodabottle (talk) 04:29, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Satisfies WP:POLITICIAN. RayTalk 17:35, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - why Nadkarni was marked for afd - It was difficult for me to end why all politicians are notable though I find it in wiki notable guidelines. Not all M.L.A’s turn into some ministers in India. Likewise is M.Ps (Member of Parliament). I guessed that only those MLAs and MPs who serve as ministers are notable politicians. I failed in my ruling that was interpreted from the deficient guidelines set in wiki. --DoNotTellDoNotAsk (talk) 14:27, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:17, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.