Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DayStar Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 10:23, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DayStar Technologies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The company is apparently defunct, which does not necessarily make it non-notabler. Its failure to accomplish anything during its lifetime,and the consequent almost total lack of third party coverage is the problem DGG ( talk ) 06:33, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 07:17, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 07:17, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The article consists largely of unsourced material about a 2012 commercial deal, and my searches am not finding anything better than routine announcements of appointments and resignations, layoffs, and in 2013 a sale of the company's technology ([1] – via HighBeam (subscription required) ). Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 17:12, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.