Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn Christadelphians

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:17, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dawn Christadelphians[edit]

Religious group with no claim of notability. Googling "Dawn Christadelphians" gives 369 hits, 85 of them relevant. - Bobet 16:02, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Wikipedia is not a vehicle for propaganda or self-promotion JoJan 18:11, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I dont see any propaganda or self promotion, unless you count the statements of belief as propaganda, in which case we may as well delete all articles about religious groups, as all are going to deal to some extent with that groups belief system. Plus, plenty of people are interested in "minor" religions, and an encyclopaedia seems to be the logical place to look for such information. Jcuk 19:41, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. My Google search turned up only 79 unique hits, most of which were copies of each other and several of which led to 404 errors. There seems to be no evidence of this denomination existing other than a couple of its own websites and some open forums. I suppose this group is real but it's really unverifiable. If they'd like to merit a Wikipedia article I suggest they do some community service and get a few stories with a local newspaper. Durova 21:13, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Christadelphians--eleuthero 21:15, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Seems like a very minor fraction of the Christadelphians, which are a small denomination in themselves. As comparison, "dawn christadelphians" gets 441 Google hits, while "christadelphian" gets 94,000. It may be me mentioned in Christadelphian, but not on this level of detail. (It already has an External link for their site.) JoaoRicardo^talk 19:14, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as non-notable group. Stifle 01:01, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Most of this information is already included in the main Christadelphians article.RJB 22:48, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.