Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davis wong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No sources that can be found with searches to establish notability per the guidelines for inclusion. Technically closed under the soft deletion close policy given the lack of comments, but I doubt there will ever be substantial third-party coverage that would justify an article. Malinaccier (talk) 05:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Davis wong

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources found fails WP:RS, Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Zazzysa (talk) 06:48, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete insufficient sources to establish notability or to verify claims made. Article strikes me as promotional. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 06:56, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:57, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:57, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.