Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davide Petrucci (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz ^talk 00:52, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Davide Petrucci[edit]

The player still fails WP:ATHLETE as he has not made a professional first team appearance. Article was speedily deleted three days ago, after being deleted five times previous to that. A further speedy request today was turned down. Eddie6705 (talk) 20:03, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete' player still fails WP:ATHLETE.Uksam88 (talk) 20:29, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Eddie6705 (talk) 20:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; player still fails WP:ATHLETE. Recreate when/if becomes notable. Giant Snowman 21:13, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Sc straker (talk) 22:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, for god's sake! This boy is not notable. – PeeJay 23:59, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Furthermore, in violation of the GFDL, it seems like the version that is currently in place is an exact copy of the version in my userspace (see User:PeeJay2K3/Davide Petrucci), except for the addition of a copyrighted image that shouldn't even be there. – Pee Jay 00:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - for now, he fails the guidelines for notability. Camw (talk) 08:26, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, fails notability criteria for footballers per WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN with no other claim to fame. No noticeable change to his notability status since previous AfD deletion.--ClubOranje^T 08:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everyone above. Suggest SALTing due to high incidence of recreation -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:36, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete the fact that he has still not made his debut proves the point. Still not yet notable. And salt. --Dweller (talk) 12:28, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.