Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Wolkinson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:00, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

David Wolkinson

Another contested prod for an election candidate, this time for the Michigan House of Representatives. Wikipedia is not an election hoarding: per WP:BIO#Politicians, just being a candidate does not confer notability. The references say only that he was active in student politics, has been a candidate before, and has a blog. Delete as not notable. JohnCD (talk) 09:11, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:BIO#Politicians, which states that just being a candidate for political office doesn't guarantee notability. Notability would otherwise be conferred by significant press coverage, but Wolkinson doesn't have this. PeterSymonds | talk 09:38, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per PeterSymonds. -[[Ryan]] ^{(me) (talk)} 11:27, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, wikipedia is not a local political blog. If he gets elected to the U.S. Congress or higher, then he can have an article. KleenupKrew (talk) 13:16, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable enough yet. --John Nagle (talk) 17:32, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do Not Delete - David is a significant figure in Michigan politics. Rock2942 (talk) 15:24, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete being a candidate is not enough for notability.-- danntm ^T _C 16:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:30, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No assertion of notability beyond the subject's being a candidate for a political party nomination, and being a candidate for a state legislative seat - neither of which is inherently notable. --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 00:51, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.