Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Winston

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 10:46, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

David Winston[edit]

David Winston (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet WP:BLP or WP:GNG. Sources are non-reliable and not notable, and subject has not received any significant attention in independent media or made notable accomplishments. Delta13C (talk) 02:47, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:28, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:28, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:28, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There is no significant coverage in reliable, independent sources of this herbalist. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 07:40, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I just went through the "sources" on the article. None are really reliable or independent. They are mostly small websites by small groups he's involved in. The groups don't seem notable, so it's not really notable that he co-founded them. Much of the text is promotional, and I had to cut some "sources" that don't even mention him, but are rather things like adult-education listings where anyone can teach a course. - CorbieV 21:03, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.