Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Traylor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Devon County Cricket Club List A players. (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 21:55, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

David Traylor[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable cricketer, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 07:49, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:54, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:54, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:54, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Devon County Cricket Club List A players Has played 1 List-A match but I couldn't find any significant coverage. A reasonably significant minor counties career though may mean sources exist offline or locally. Using a similar precedent to that used by WP:FOOTY where a player with one or a few matches, but no coverage, is redirected/deleted and a suitable WP:ATD exists here. This is another that probably should have been BOLDly redirected. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Devon County Cricket Club List A players. Insufficient significant coverage – very few non-trivial mentions in routine local cricket and football reports (all in the Herald Express), and the usual wide-ranging scorecard databases – so fails WP:GNG. This trumps the trivial pass/arguable fail of the weak NCRIC. Redirect is an accepted ATD. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 12:49, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete very clearly fails one event notability. There is no indication that Traylor is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:19, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.