Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Tillinghast

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 19:39, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

David Tillinghast[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears not to meet WP:NACADEMIC or WP:CREATIVE. Insufficiently sourced, plus WP:COI issues. Ploni (talk) 16:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Poetry, and California. Ploni (talk) 16:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:AUTHOR notability would seem to be the likeliest, but for that we need multiple in-depth published reviews of multiple books, those are usually hard to come by for poetry, and I don't see them here. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:18, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable WP:AUTHOR.Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as doesn't seem to meet WP:NAUTHOR due to lack of independant coverage. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:46, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not passing WP:NAUTHOR. Orientls (talk) 05:26, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.