Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Tate (broadcaster)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 08:54, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

David Tate (broadcaster)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that he meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 21:34, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:45, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:45, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't see any claims of notability, and I don't see any references. My search for references did not find anything significant to add. Jeepday (talk) 15:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:40, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. LizardJr8 (talk) 21:01, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article was created by a virtual WP:SPA named "Analyticalassociates", whose edit history includes a reference to "myself, David Tate" in an edit summary — which means it's an WP:AUTOBIO. Not that there was actually much doubt of that, because it contains a lot of completely unsourced biographical information, with its only footnote being a one-off glancing namecheck of his existence as a giver of soundbite in a magazine article that wasn't about him. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced a hell of a lot better than this, and people aren't entitled to put themselves into Wikipedia for the publicity. Bearcat (talk) 17:51, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No reliable sources, no evidence of notability. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 11:41, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.