Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Sturzaker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (X! · talk) · @172 · 03:07, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

David Sturzaker

Fails Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Entertainers notability criteria. Oscarthecat (talk) 18:21, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No third-party sources (or any sources) establishing notability. The JPS ^{talk to me} 18:25, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- I'^mperator 18:34, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable enough as a stage actor alone. Article created by editor who believed (like too many people today) that a bit part in a soap opera was more significant than playing in Shakespeare at the Globe. Article expanded, refs added, but could use attention from someone who knows more about British theatre than my informed-only-by-Google-searching self. He does seem to have other British press coverage, too. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:38, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Plenty more reliable sources found by Google News, including several more leading roles at the Globe. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:33, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. Jeni ^(talk) 14:33, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable stage work more than meets requirements of WP:GNG and WP:ENT. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 00:20, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.