Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Stuckenberg 2024 presidential campaign

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. The consensus here is to Delete this article but any editor is free to create a Redirect. Liz Read! Talk! 20:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

David Stuckenberg 2024 presidential campaign[edit]

David Stuckenberg 2024 presidential campaign (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stuckenberg, nor his campaign, have substantial media coverage from reliable and notable sources. He has been polling constantly below 10 individual votes and creating an article for his campagin opens a can of worms of making an article for every minor presidential candidate polling in the dozens Scu ba (talk) 20:44, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So it looks like David Stuckenberg made an account to comment on this AfD. Of course I could be wrong and it might be a fan or something. Either way, bias seems to be there. And votes to merge seem rather strange to me, as I don't know what additional content they would want at the proposed target that isn't already there. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 23:18, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:WTAF. If an article about the person isn't notable, their campaign surely won't be unless WP:1EVENT applies. – The Grid (talk) 14:39, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Stuckenberg is the last remaining non-withdrawn candidate on the ballot besides Trump. See [[1]]. Him and Trump are the last 2 standing! DStuckenberg2024 (talk) 17:58, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DStuckenberg2024 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

  • Delete Merely standing as a candidate doesn't give notability per WP:NPOL, nothing to show that there is enough coverage of this campaign to make it notable. Shaws username . talk . 18:23, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge with 2024 Republican Party presidential candidates. He is on the ballot in a bunch of states so it’s worth mentioning that there are non-withdrawn candidates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1009:B063:AC82:FD4E:C094:689D:E954 (talk) 18:32, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - my most serious concern is one of WP:COI - either the subject, or a member of his campaign, created and/or edited this page. I join with the others concerned about lack of significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 20:02, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete More American election season cruft. Receiving 25 votes out of 324,575 cast in New Hampshire. Less votes that people writing in ceasefire. Nearly 20 times more people wrote in Joe Biden in the Republican primary in New Hampshire than voted for this guy. Someone thought this deserved an article? Where's the significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources? AusLondonder (talk) 07:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge with the 2024 Republican Party presidential candidates page. His formal registration, appearance on several state ballots, and votes received (while miniscule) are enough for a placement on that page. There is definitely not enough coverage for a separate page.Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 23:08, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.