Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Saucedo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. v/r - TP 22:18, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- David Saucedo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No clear reason of notability. Does not meet any of the requirements in Wikipedia:Notability (sports)#Boxing Cambalachero (talk) 21:43, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – He does meet WP:NSPORTS since he has fought for a major world championship (WBA featherweight) per this. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 00:07, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Giants, who has verified that Saucedo meets the boxing criteria at NSPORTS. Jenks24 (talk) 20:50, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - per WP:NSPORTS.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:16, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Nominator is incorrect. Per Giants2008, meets Wikipedia:Notability (sports)#Boxing as he has fought for the WBA Featherweight title. The article certainly needs improvement though, as his notability is not explicitly established. Should be easy enough given the large number of notable sources available. Sailing to Byzantium (talk) 21:07, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Fighter is meeting NSPORTS. Xajaso (talk) 22:13, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 18:03, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 18:03, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.