Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Reynolds Mitchell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

David Reynolds Mitchell

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Non-notable soldier. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 20:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 20:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 20:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 20:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lacks SIGCOV in multiple RS necessary to meet WP:GNG. One third of the page is about his more famous family members but notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Mztourist (talk) 05:58, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there is not enough coverage of this individual to justify an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there don't seem to be enough sources that indicate this person's notability Totalstgamer (talk) 08:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.