Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Pilbeam
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep as the nominator has withdrawn their nomination and no one else recommends that the page be deleted. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:56, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- David Pilbeam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No Google News results for him. Lots of Google hits but they are almost invariably of three types: 1. blog posts by or about something he's written (non-RS) 2. hits to his publications 3. stuff from his employer, Harvard
It's entirely possible that this article satisfies WP:N but I cant find anything RS-compliant that is about him specifically. UseTheCommandLine (talk) 06:06, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep -- I was unclear about the WP:N criteria for academics, specifically WP:ACADEMIC. Apologies. -- 76.105.237.98 (talk) 09:31, 19 February 2013 (UTC) (got logged out somehow) -- UseTheCommandLine (talk) 09:32, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawn by nominator -- UseTheCommandLine (talk) 09:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.