Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Penn (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:MUSBIO and WP:COMPOSER indicate the possibility that a subject meets our notability requirement. However, the consensus here is that the subject does not. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

David Penn[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is a DJ who does not appear to meet the WP:MUSBIO notability guidelines. First ref doesn't even mention subject, others provide only WP:TRIVIALMENTION coverage. Could find no reliable independent sources that discuss this person in any depth. As you consider your !vote to delete or keep, please consider that the notability guidelines given at WP:MUSICBIO and others are meant to be tools to help editors quickly assess whether or not a given subject is likely to be notable, not a measure of abstract notability (which, if questioned, must still be proven in the usual ways, whatever the guidelines may suggest). Thanks! KDS4444^Talk 19:44, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Although the previous nomination failed because it was noted the requirements for WP:MUSICBIO#C6 were met, it seems WP:HOLE is relevant to this discussion. Additionally, I can't find any significant coverage in any reliable sources. Babykitsune (talk) 06:12, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've updated a ref and added another to help establish identity. Meets WP:NMUSIC by Criteria 2 for Musicians and Ensembles and Criteria 1 for Composers and Lyricists. --Pc13 (talk) 17:16, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 20:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:32, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:03, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:04, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Esquivalience ^t 01:55, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience ^t 01:55, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete at best and draft and userfy if needed, there is something for an article here but it's still questionable. SwisterTwister talk 02:56, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - some marginal notability, but not enough to show that they pass notability threshold. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.