Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Pérez II
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:09, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- David Pérez II (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No coverage in reliable sources to verify or sustain an article. Fails general notability, WP:NACADEMICS and WP:BASIC. Not highly cited. Only an Assistant Professor. Jbh (talk) 02:10, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. -- Ascii002 (talk · contribs · guestbook) 10:23, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- Ascii002 (talk · contribs · guestbook) 10:24, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete either he's non-notable or it's WP:TOOSOON I can't find discussions of his work, profiles.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:07, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Assistant professors are usually WP:TOOSOON to pass WP:PROF and I can see no evidence that he is exceptional in this respect. The article says only that he has published some things and won student and emerging-academic awards, none of which is sufficient. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:47, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --Inother (talk) 10:58, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.