Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Owens
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:36, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
David Owens[edit]
- David Owens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Creator contested PROD on this footballer who has never played at a fully-professional level with the rationale that there are enough reliable sources to pass WP:N. However, most of these are routine football coverage (match reports, player profiles etc.) and these do not pass WP:NTEMP. Apart from this, the only other media coverage is of a driving offence, which again seems to be routine announcements from the Manchester Evening News.
- Delete as nominator. -- BigDom 10:59, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep - Wigan Atheltic are a professional football club, meaning he has played at a professional level. There seems to be just enough coverage to warrant notability. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:57, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Of course, as the article never states he played for Wigan, as WP:ATHLETE requires an individual to compete- being listed on the roster isn't enough. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 16:49, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Didn't play for Wigan but has since played non league football for various clubs - thus fails wp:athlete. Trivial mentions make up the cites - thus fails wp:notability. Szzuk (talk) 17:55, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless Conference players are now "allowed" per the guidelines. Didn't play for Wigan, not even in a cup competition. Geschichte (talk) 12:40, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:43, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - never played for a professional club, fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:BIO -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:43, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:ATH and no significant third-party coverage beyond the odd WP:NTEMP stuff means he fails WP:GNG too. --Jimbo[online] 13:37, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Easily fails WP:ATHLETE, as pointed out above, and seems to perhaps have been created only in response to his legal issues. May qualify as a speedy candidate, based on BLP concerns as well. UnitAnode 01:57, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - never played for a professional club, fails WP:ATHLETE and [[WP:BIO] Steve-Ho (talk) 12:54, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.