Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Osmond
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 11:02, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- David Osmond (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails notability in much the same way that Michael Castro's does. He appeared on American Idol in season 8 but didn't make the final cut down show much less the semi-finals. Almost all of the references are related to either Idol or to his family, not because of his own notability. User:Woohookitty Diamming fool! 07:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The main contributor to the page is continually removing the AfD tag. So if this is deleted, please watchlist it.--User:Woohookitty Diamming fool! 04:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: no stand alone notability, trivial coverage, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 11:01, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note – This user has been blocked for sock puppetry and vote-stacking at AfDs. List of Confirmed sock puppets of User:JamesBurns Untick (talk) 14:00, 21 April 2009 (UTC) [reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, basically his claims to fame are being related to someone famous, and appearing as an unsuccessful contestant on a television talent programme. Neither of these meet the WP:N or WP:ENTERTAINER notability bar. Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.