Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Lynn (preacher)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:19, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- David Lynn (preacher) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Between the edit summary given as to why the article was created and the lack of notability (seems like his major claim to fame is debating people on the street), I see this person as not Wiki worthy and perhaps can be seen as only existing to advertise his ministry. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 19:26, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Non-notable "preacher" who's only claim to fame is causing trouble in gay neighbourhoods, fails WP:GNG. --John B123 (talk) 19:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:56, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 20:11, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete street preachers are rarely notable for such. They lack organized congregations, and lots of other things. They sometimes get short coverage, but not of very high quality. They are one group where a few local news articles really should not lead to creating an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:04, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete undersourced, does not meet WP:GNG. CAVETOWNFAN (talk) 14:05, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.