Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Lucas Burge (Second nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:01, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
An employee of David Lucas Burge created this page. This is the same person, product, and reason as before (represented by the discussion below).Aruffo 03:06, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per G4: recreation of previously deleted material. Teke 03:07, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It isn't a direct recreation. However, the article doesn't currently make a case for his notability either. Capitalistroadster 03:32, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - it is substantially similar. Anyway, he's probably had enough time since September 2005 to become notable, or for wikipedia consensus to change, so I vote also to put it through AfD. - Richardcavell 05:25, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable. --Coredesat 08:13, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Why is this listed twice? Did someone undelete the article after it got deleted? --Coredesat 08:13, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment have shifted this to a second nomination page and have listed the page up appropriately. Previous AFD of this article is found here --Arnzy (whats up?) 11:43, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Why is this listed twice? Did someone undelete the article after it got deleted? --Coredesat 08:13, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as recreation of previously deleted stuff. --Arnzy (whats up?) 11:39, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Wikipedia is not paper. Snugspout 14:21, 16 June 2006 (OTC)
- Comment Just because Wikipedia is not paper, does not validate one's inclusion in the encyclopedia. Kershner 14:31, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Snugspout, please read WP:NOT]. Wikipedia may not be paper, but it is also an attempt at an encyclopedia. Bwithh 17:59, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. Ted 14:24, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails every test in WP:BIO. NN. Kershner 14:31, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not-notable.--Auger Martel 16:30, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above Bwithh 17:59, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.