Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Lin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 20:59, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

David Lin

David Lin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

This article is a hoax. The subject is non-notable, whose feats were either exaggerated or made up. There is no evidence, anywhere, to verify the information in the article. The quotes provided therein are from an internet forum: http://www.dimsum.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1178&sid=0b88b95c1ff025a1cb832d8c9fd694e7. I am also nominating the following related pages because they are likewise bogus and created by the same user(s). The subject of this article, David Lin, purportedly founded these organizations. No evidence suggests their existence.

• Zhonghua Citizen's League
• LS&D Holdings

--Jiang 02:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Terence Ong _{(C | R)} 05:03, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all as apparent hoaxes per nom. --Dhartung | Talk 05:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete — Delete per nomination. Kudos to Jiang for his extensive research into the matter. –- kungming·2 | ^{(Talk·Contact)} 07:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom.. Clearly a hoax, am trying to follow other bogus links and redirects...SkierRMH 09:03, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as an apparent hoax. Daveydweeb (^chat/_patch) 12:59, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm a bit wary of this. This is rather severe misinformation. I wonder if the creator, User:BogdanM, was aware of it's invalidity. Black-Velvet 13:40, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. As hoax. Spinach Dip 20:15, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.