Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Haave
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Delete as A7 and G11. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 18:41, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- David Haave (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable author. All sources are store pages of his books, most of the article is unsourced, and I found no reliable sources online. Borderline G11. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 06:25, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and United States of America. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 06:25, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation, Military, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:50, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - As with the nominator, I could not find any independent sources. The style of the article reads like a blurb that a work-experience publicist wrote, with phrases such as "The author has taken on writing books to a whole new level" and "David has worked to help one community at a time, one child at a time, and has flourished in helping share love with others across the beautiful Nation of America." Ugh.--Gronk Oz (talk) 13:23, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly promotional, and badly-done at that. His military service is not notable. Intothatdarkness 14:10, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete arguably a speedy-spam-deletion candidate. The subject doesn't appear to be sufficiently notable but even if someone finds sufficient references, the article's tone is so far away from being acceptable that we might as well blow up the darn thing. Pichpich (talk) 19:22, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG. Page created by an WP:SPA. Mztourist (talk) 06:45, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per all of the above. If the subject wrote this, it’s another reason to delete. If he paid someone to write this dreadful mess, then he needs to file a fraud complaint with his state's agency for protection of veterans. Bearian (talk) 08:00, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.