Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Goldstein

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Rjd0060 (talk) 17:04, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

David Goldstein[edit]

article fails to establish why this person is notable. Lacks 3rd party sources Rtphokie (talk) 00:21, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep seems to be semi-well known. -Icewedge (talk) 02:17, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A few sources, indicating notability. Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 04:39, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as article now has properly formatted references, additional references, and notability is now properly established. - Dravecky (talk) 06:19, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, appears notable, given sources. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 07:38, 6 May 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. Non-notable blogger and sponsor of a failed joke ballot initiative. WP:BLP1E applies. The only possible notability he has is in direct relation to Tim Eyman, and a single sentence mention of his joke initiative in the Tim Eyman article is more than sufficient. KleenupKrew (talk) 10:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
keep met WP:BIO. JoshuaZ (talk) 16:00, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.