Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Gale (basketball)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:02, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- David Gale (basketball) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
NBA Development League does not qualify members for automatic notability per WP:BASKETBALL. InsertCleverPhraseHere 07:46, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 16:09, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 16:09, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 16:09, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete' According to WP:NHOOPS, he needs to have wona major award in the D-league to be notable for that tenure alone.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:01, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Just to be clear in case anybody's not sure, he's a an assistant coach in the NBA Development League rather than a player — but that's not an automatic notability freebie either, so it doesn't change anything as such (although it does mean you have to be careful not to misjudge him against the inclusion criteria for players). That said, the sourcing here is entirely to primary sources, with no indication of reliable source coverage about him shown, and nothing claimed in the article grants him a presumption of notability in the absence of enough sourcing to pass WP:GNG. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 14:32, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as still questionable for independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 23:19, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.