Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Eager (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete G11 (promotional) by Jimfbleak (talk · contribs). —David Eppstein (talk) 07:52, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

David Eager[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination of a declined proposed deletion. Concern was "Unambigous self promotion. Also Chorltonchild and Prof David Eager seem to be sockpuppets of each other as both accounts have made few edits to other than this article. This should have really been speedied as a recreation of an already deleted article." SpinningSpark 23:13, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:50, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:50, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete GS h-index of 11 not nearly high enough to pass WP:Prof#C1. What else is there? Xxanthippe (talk) 04:27, 16 November 2018 (UTC).[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.