Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Desmond

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:30, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

David Desmond

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of general notability. Being related to a notable person does not make someone notable. Writing a book that won a vanity award does not make one notable. Writing occasionally cited studies does not necessarily make one notable. I couldn't find sources that meet WP:GNG. Examining the history shows that the article is almost certainly self-authored. --Michael White^T·C 01:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:NOTINHERITED.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now and I wouldn't thinking moving to one of the articles would be best as it's an unlikely search and all my searches found was a few links at Books and Scholar. SwisterTwister talk 06:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agree WP:NOTINHERITED, no WP:RS, etc. – uncontroversial delete. Agricola44 (talk) 15:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC).[reply]
Delete: lacks significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 07:12, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.